<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privileging by Proxy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.compass-clinical.com/resources/accreditation-resource-center/privileging-by-proxy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.compass-clinical.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:59:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMS Welcomes Comments on Joint Commission Deemed Status Application : Hospital Accreditation</title>
		<link>http://www.compass-clinical.com/resources/accreditation-resource-center/privileging-by-proxy/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>CMS Welcomes Comments on Joint Commission Deemed Status Application : Hospital Accreditation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.compass-clinical.com/?page_id=1579#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] Requirements for accreditation-This area probably will receive the largest number of comments. The question is whether the Joint Commission’s standards meet or exceed CMS Conditions of Participation. Any hospital that has undergone a validation survey can share their experiences of how well TJC surveyors identified deficiencies compared to the follow-up survey by the state. Many known gaps in the standards were remedied in the January and March standards release from the Joint Commission, but some still remain. (See “A JAYCO Tap: Privileging by Proxy.”) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Requirements for accreditation-This area probably will receive the largest number of comments. The question is whether the Joint Commission’s standards meet or exceed CMS Conditions of Participation. Any hospital that has undergone a validation survey can share their experiences of how well TJC surveyors identified deficiencies compared to the follow-up survey by the state. Many known gaps in the standards were remedied in the January and March standards release from the Joint Commission, but some still remain. (See “A JAYCO Tap: Privileging by Proxy.”) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
